T-shirt origami

http://homepage.usask.ca/~kvl014/tshirt.mpg

A fast, efficient method of folding t-shirts--pinch in two place, fold, twist, fold remaining sleeve, and it's done. The bits I had to work to notice are that the diagonal fold involves a twist, and it helped to think of my left hand as getting swaddled in the cloth.

T-shirt origami

http://homepage.usask.ca/~kvl014/tshirt.mpg

A fast, efficient method of folding t-shirts--pinch in two place, fold, twist, fold remaining sleeve, and it's done. The bits I had to work to notice are that the diagonal fold involves a twist, and it helped to think of my left hand as getting swaddled in the cloth.

Could your printer betray you?

So help me, this sort of thing would have been insanely paranoid in previous era, but these days, many printers are pre-set to put revealing patterns of yellow dots in their output.

It isn't actually news--apparently, it's been going on for at least a couple of years. I'm a moderate news junkie--I wonder if my missing this when it came out should make me feel even more paranoid.

http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/index.php

After having printed out the test sheets, I read the article more carefully, and found that it's just laser printers. Presumably, an ink jet is capable of maintaining discretion.

Of course, most printing doesn't carry any risks, but what if you did want to make sure your printing wasn't water-marked?

I'm not sure that using a black-and-white xerox machine is good protection--it could still have a yellow ink cartridge. The best bet would be either using a machine that you can check for extra cartridges. Failing that, there's something to be said for places like Staples which use the honor system for payment rather than Kinkos, which uses a tracable payment system.

Here's somewhat more:

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/secret_forensic.html

Addendum: It's not just the principle of the thing, it's the money: one of the commenters to the schneier article realized that the forensic dots were why his yellow ink kept running out even though he was only printing in black.

The Other Addendum: I got the EFF link from Marginal Revolution, an economics etc. blog.

Could your printer betray you?

So help me, this sort of thing would have been insanely paranoid in previous era, but these days, many printers are pre-set to put revealing patterns of yellow dots in their output.

It isn't actually news--apparently, it's been going on for at least a couple of years. I'm a moderate news junkie--I wonder if my missing this when it came out should make me feel even more paranoid.

http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/index.php

After having printed out the test sheets, I read the article more carefully, and found that it's just laser printers. Presumably, an ink jet is capable of maintaining discretion.

Of course, most printing doesn't carry any risks, but what if you did want to make sure your printing wasn't water-marked?

I'm not sure that using a black-and-white xerox machine is good protection--it could still have a yellow ink cartridge. The best bet would be either using a machine that you can check for extra cartridges. Failing that, there's something to be said for places like Staples which use the honor system for payment rather than Kinkos, which uses a tracable payment system.

Here's somewhat more:

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/secret_forensic.html

Addendum: It's not just the principle of the thing, it's the money: one of the commenters to the schneier article realized that the forensic dots were why his yellow ink kept running out even though he was only printing in black.

The Other Addendum: I got the EFF link from Marginal Revolution, an economics etc. blog.