Oct. 21st, 2017 09:36 am
nancylebov: (green leaves)

Ex-KGB guy lecturing about subversion in 1983.

The beginning is ... amusing. He claims that the Soviet Union is immune to subversion because it's closed off from outside influences. It might also be amusing that he claims religion is the only thing which holds a society together, but fails to notice that the USSR tried to weaken religion.

However, his claims that it's possible to take a society down by amplifying its internal disruptive influences might be true.

The part that catches my attention is that cultivating no-compromise attitudes among people is very destructive. And that if you're looking to punish the other guy rather than get a good solution for the both of you, you're heading for trouble.

Unfortunately, it takes two to cooperate.

I'm wondering whether the world is worse than it needs to be, not so much because people are personally rotten as because there are organizations encouraging bad behavior for reasons which have nothing to do with the self-interest of the obvious culprits.

I suggest that malice is not adorable. Even if it's from people you agree with against people you don't trust. And that tear-it-all-downism might actually be bad for you.

There's a challenge here because hunting for negative foreign influence can also be a destructive force.

I'm not sure what the answer is. Look for people of good will. Don't make things worse.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
Pictures of t-shirts

Let's see if this works. I've got some tie-dyed t-shirts which are in such bad condition they aren't worth keeping.

I posted this to facebook, and got some good recommendations for tie-dye which is being done currently. I'm reposting here partly in the hope for more recommendations, and partly so that I can find this again.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
I cooked a thing I'm happy with-- stovetop cooked (on high gas) 1 lb. tuna belly (other tuna would probably be as good), and a medium large tomato.

I started with olive oil and a some Penzy's Ozark seasoning (salt, Tellicherry black pepper, spices and herbs, granulated garlic and paprika), cooked the tomato part way, added the tuna and cooked (with some stirring) till it was cooked through.

I mixed up some Mexican sour cream (not that much different from the usual, maybe milder) and fresh dill, and kept it on the side so there'd be some contrast of temperature.

I thought the sour cream and dill would be a big deal, but not so much. The tuna/tomato thing was really nice-- it would be plausible as a restaurant dish. (Go ahead, tell me this is a completely standard recipe I didn't know about.)

There are a couple of drawbacks on the restaurant side-- it isn't very pretty, with the rather beige tuna and the squelched tomato. On the other hand, there's an orange broth that looks pretty good.

It's also sort of intermediate between a plate entree and a soup. It might made sense to have a higher proportion of tomato and serve it as a soup. Or possibly add some dark mushrooms for the contrast, and I think the taste would work.

Anyway, it's tasty and quick. It's low carb, should you be doing that. I actually tried to figure out a starch to go with it, and nothing was obvious. I think any of the usual things-- potatoes, pasta, or rice-- would go with it well enough.

As stated, the sour cream with dill wasn't that important if you want it to be dairy-free. You could garnish it with dill. I'd also put some parmesan cheese in, but it didn't seem to make much difference. Possibly a version with a lot of parmesan (baked?) would work.
nancylebov: (green leaves)

I'm not sure why the site-embed isn't working, but there's a good video link in the historythings link at the bottom.

The Rolligon!

This is amazing. I'm not sure whether there's a practical use for them, but it's sad if there isn't.

There is a Rolligon company. They make a bunch of interesting-looking construction equipment, but none with huge soft tires. I'm not sure what the legalities would be of just making toy versions. Or what it would take to get permission and make the toys for safe. It seems like a missed commercial opportunity.

Heinlein quotes about Rolligons on the moon-- he may have just picked up the name, or invented it. I would assume the Rolligon would give a soft ride on the earth, and softer on the moon.

More about Rolligons. The idea of squishy rollers were invented by Alaskan villagers-- they used inflated sealskins. The trucks were actually used in Alaska.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
At last! A reassuring link!…/…/30/book-review-barriers/
It turns out that doing biology is really hard. There's a lot of tacit knowledge involved. Knowledge that might only be in one person's head that they haven't documented. And there are probably issues related to highly specific equipment.

This piece is funny, at least if you like tales of human purpose frustrated by an uncooperative universe.

It cites Overly honest methods.

Link thanks to
nancylebov: (green leaves)
The usual discussion of stigma against fat people is about what it costs them, and that's reasonable because it costs them a lot.

However, there's another side-- what stigma against fat people costs everyone. I've read a lot from women who put off their ambitions for both work and love until they lose weight, which may never happen. It wouldn't surprise me if the same pattern (starting at higher fat %s) occurs for men, it's just that I haven't heard about it.

How much accomplishment and love haven't happened because of people who don't try until they think their bodies would be approved of? And they aren't hallucinating the prejudice-- how many fat people get turned down just because they're fat?

So, to Trump, because everything seems to get related to Trump. Unless I'm missing something, Republicans are more willing to accept fat candidates than Democrats are. Is it possible that Democrats are throwing away more talent than they can afford to? (I'm not extremely sure of the premise here-- let me know about if there are fat Democratic politicians which would contradict my theory.)
nancylebov: (green leaves)

In addition to the specific case, the article has a history of prosecutors withholding evidence and the laws related to that. It's been very bad, but recently, some prosecutors have been supporting broad disclosure, a requirement that *all* the evidence be shared.

I'm not convinced that this will be enough, though it seems like a good idea.

I think great deal of the problem is the adversarial approach to trials. It seems unlikely that Americans will give up the prosecutor vs. defense system, so I propose adding a third person to trials who's not allied with either side-- their job is to repeatedly address the question of whether the arguments make sense.

Zande Myrande wrote up a beginning of a trial which includes a third advocate-- this may make the idea clearer.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
I've mostly been on facebook and Slate Star Codex, but I've been thinking I've been neglecting DW/LJ. It's not just nostalgia-- neither FB nor SSC are especially searchable, though SSC is somewhat better. I think the approach is to download the whole history in a massive blob, and then search it. I should probably ask for details.

Considering how popular they are, being unsearchable may be something a lot of people want a lot of the time, but I find that I'd like to refer back to what I've said now and then. This means getting better about tagging things, too.

Facebook is evil for many reasons, but a big one is that it sort of implies reliable contact between people, but it makes contact very unreliable.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
This has been posted and re-posted on facebook. I haven't seen a link back to the author.


Credited to a friend of a friend: Hiba Bint Zeinab, who is Palestinian-Lebanese (borrowed from said friend with permission)

"I'm at the point where I can't see how focus on the Israel Palestine question re: Chicago Dyke March is anything other than derailment.

I'd also like to say that perception that pro-Palestine sentiment here is being silenced *as a general trend* very much does not sit well with me because I believe the silencing to be happening the other way around, and think this is in fact a longstanding destructive feature of discourse surrounding the Palestinian cause. Also, I believe most of those engaging in defense of a pro-Palestinian liberation stance right now mean well but do not understand how much its framing decenters actual Palestinian welfare.

I will elaborate on both counts. I'm agitated from all sides about this and I can't do brevity so bear with me I guess.

First, the derailment. It's of particularly troubling sort because it falls into a larger pattern of whataboutism where what *should be* a case of clearcut antisemitism cannot ever be identified and unilaterally condemned by the left without also being hashed and rehashed in exculpatory ways "because Israel."

This is ESPECIALLY troubling when:

- There is a persistent phenomenon that's almost like a lefty inversion of the concept Israeli exceptionalism. Like a reverse- exceptionalism, whereby discussion of Israel's transgressions are held to singular standards of scrutiny to the exception of other nations/populations with comparable and/or far more deplorable histories and actions and crises. And in that I am including all the unspeakable injustice and destruction the larger MENA region has wrought to Palestinians, and how accountability seems no concern there, in part *because* of eternal return to obsessive, unilateral focus on Israel as the central Palestinian issue.

Read more... )
nancylebov: (green leaves)
Before Balticon, I cleared out a lot of button slogans that I didn't think were selling well enough.*

So I've got about a thousand buttons that I have no obvious use for. They're generally in good condition and they're sorted by slogan.

I could just throw them out, but does anyone have any better ideas?

Would anyone like to pick up the buttons? I'm in South Philadelphia. Or I could mail them. I'm estimating the postage at $50 to $100, paid in advance. I'll come up with something more exact if anyone is interested.

*Removing "Free Hugs" was an error. I'll be putting it back in the trays.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
Useful information from John Tangent:

If the link failed goto and look for the Device Manager. You can make it ring no matter the setting, lock and even erase it.

And from Kirin Wagle:

iOS devices do include a standard feature that emits a beeping sound when you go to Find My iPhone and clap the "play a sound" button. They also report their last known position when the battery dies.
nancylebov: (green leaves)

This is monstrous-- 15 year *minimum* for teenagers involved in sexting. "Involved" includes encouraging another teen to sext. The picture doesn't even have to be sent.

Name of bill: "Protecting Against Child Exploitation Act of 2017"

Here's the roll call list in case you have a Representative you'd like to praise or punish.

Please call your Senators about this.

You are, of course, under no obligation to read comments at the link, but I'm an occasional comment reader at Reason, and this is the first time I've seen them turn against Republicans in general.

I have phoned my Senators. Both phone lines were open. If you need contact information for your Senators, here it is.

Reason is the nearest thing to a major news organization which has covered the story. Should you have a habit of hating on libertarians, please remember this-- there's so much going wrong that one point of view and one bunch of activists isn't enough to keep it covered.

The other two sites with stories about the anti-sexting bill were
Unicorn Booty (gay) and The Ring of Fire Network (progressive).
nancylebov: (green leaves)

They are the Dark Knights of the office: lone vigilantes who police the workplace, ever watchful for heinous crimes that cannot go unpunished. Woe to those who step out of line and return from break two minutes late, leave food in the office fridge too long and fail to refill the photocopier...Researchers [Katy DeCelles and Karl Aquino] in Canada asked 2,000 people in the US if they had come across workplace vigilantes, meaning those who took it upon themselves to dob in their colleagues for breaches of company policy, or what they deemed to be egregious moral violations. 58% had, and on average, respondents recalled four work colleagues over the course of their career who fitted the description. (From The Guardian, ). You can read the original paper here.

Here's what I noticed: That sort of enforcement is a very strong drive for the people who do it.

Office vigilantes *might* get fired, but management apparently doesn't use the problem to motivate looking at whether some of the rules don't make sense.

It's been a while since I've read The No Asshole Rule (a book about why management should never tolerate workplace bullies) but if this sort of bullying wasn't included, it should have been.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
If you see a typo in one of your years' old posts, do you feel compelled to correct it?
nancylebov: (green leaves)

This seems like an unmanageable science fiction premise-- it's quite possible that aliens living in the hole in the microwave background wouldn't be able to learn as much about the early history of the universe. This should matter for something, but what?

Also, is there any way to automatically enlarge the images from apod_rss?
nancylebov: (green leaves)

It took me a little time to figure out how to add xkcd to my reading list, so this resource might not be obvious for everyone else.
nancylebov: (green leaves)

I was torn. "Friends" leads to emotional issues. "Readers" is the DW term. "So people from livejournal can find you" might be vaguely threatening. So "contacts".

Anyway, I think the link is to a very helpful project.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
This is a private person who's willing to fund 3 projects that sound interesting to her-- 5K each.
If you have a 5Kish project that you can't get off your mind, you might want to take a look.

I’d like to fund something that’s personally meaningful to you, whether that’s moving to the city of your dreams, building a better mousetrap, or bringing strangers together.

I’ll also prioritize projects where:
Funding isn’t readily available for this kind of project
You have a unique take on the project, or your backstory is interesting
Impact extends beyond the life of your project (ex. new program vs. one-time event)
Timeline is shorter (ex. 2 months) vs. longer (ex. one year)

Get creative! I’m open to suggestions. While your project should have a sense of beginning and end, I’ll gladly fund exploratory periods like sabbaticals or research.

I’m also happy to consider proposals like an extracurricular class or moving expenses, if they’re a major obstacle standing in between you and your dreams.
nancylebov: (green leaves)

This is really excellent-- it compares Manichaean evil (evil is a force) with Augustinian evil (evil is the absence of good) and demonstates that the plot of LOTR-- and especially the climax at the Cracks of Doom are solidly consistent with the idea that victory comes from doing the right thing, even when it seems completely impractical.

Link found here. Sherwood Smith is doing a reread of LOTR.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
The subject line pretty much covers it.

If you haven't heard, livejournal has imposed a new and possibly sketchy terms of service on its users, and more people are leaving lj and heading to dw.

I'm not sure it makes sense to post my request at dw as well as lj, but I'm not sure it doesn't, so I'm cross-posting.

I'm very grateful that the original lj had open-source software so that it's possible to mirror a livejouranl (including the old posts) at dw.

October 2017

12 34567
151617181920 21


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 22nd, 2017 06:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios