Aug. 6th, 2017

nancylebov: (green leaves)
I've mostly been on facebook and Slate Star Codex, but I've been thinking I've been neglecting DW/LJ. It's not just nostalgia-- neither FB nor SSC are especially searchable, though SSC is somewhat better. I think the approach is to download the whole history in a massive blob, and then search it. I should probably ask for details.

Considering how popular they are, being unsearchable may be something a lot of people want a lot of the time, but I find that I'd like to refer back to what I've said now and then. This means getting better about tagging things, too.

Facebook is evil for many reasons, but a big one is that it sort of implies reliable contact between people, but it makes contact very unreliable.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/magazine/she-was-convicted-of-killing-her-mother-prosecutors-withheld-the-evidence-that-would-have-freed-her.html?smid=fb-share

In addition to the specific case, the article has a history of prosecutors withholding evidence and the laws related to that. It's been very bad, but recently, some prosecutors have been supporting broad disclosure, a requirement that *all* the evidence be shared.

I'm not convinced that this will be enough, though it seems like a good idea.

I think great deal of the problem is the adversarial approach to trials. It seems unlikely that Americans will give up the prosecutor vs. defense system, so I propose adding a third person to trials who's not allied with either side-- their job is to repeatedly address the question of whether the arguments make sense.

Zande Myrande wrote up a beginning of a trial which includes a third advocate-- this may make the idea clearer.
nancylebov: (green leaves)
The usual discussion of stigma against fat people is about what it costs them, and that's reasonable because it costs them a lot.

However, there's another side-- what stigma against fat people costs everyone. I've read a lot from women who put off their ambitions for both work and love until they lose weight, which may never happen. It wouldn't surprise me if the same pattern (starting at higher fat %s) occurs for men, it's just that I haven't heard about it.

How much accomplishment and love haven't happened because of people who don't try until they think their bodies would be approved of? And they aren't hallucinating the prejudice-- how many fat people get turned down just because they're fat?

So, to Trump, because everything seems to get related to Trump. Unless I'm missing something, Republicans are more willing to accept fat candidates than Democrats are. Is it possible that Democrats are throwing away more talent than they can afford to? (I'm not extremely sure of the premise here-- let me know about if there are fat Democratic politicians which would contradict my theory.)

October 2017

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
151617181920 21
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 22nd, 2017 06:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios