A year or two ago, I told people I was willing to bet that GW would leave office when he was legally required to do so. Oddly, considering the number of people who said they were worried about a coup, I didn't get much in the way of takers. There was one person who bet $5. I can't remember who it was, but it was definitely at a phillydruids or dvpn get-together. And someone else who bet me an ice cream sundae, but I'd have to go to her home in New England to collect.
I'm still willing to bet that he'll leave at the end of his term.
I'm still willing to bet that he'll leave at the end of his term.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 07:45 pm (UTC)More importantly, my attention is focused on what damage he thinks he can still do on his way out.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 09:05 pm (UTC)My sister got someone to bet her a $1000. I doubt he will pay tho. But I might be pleasantly surprised.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 02:08 am (UTC)Are you willing to offer odds? Such a thing is a legitimate worry long before it becomes a rational even-money bet; on the other hand, the odds on such a plot succeeding, and therefore the odds on it being tried, have declined with Bush's popularity. One of the reasons to worry about the "totalitarian" "socialist" nonsense, however, is the chance that part of it is, as it was in 1933, a bunch of plotters nerving themselves up to do something stupid.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 12:47 pm (UTC)I decided a coup (election cheating wouldn't be enough) is unfeasible because he hasn't got the physical courage. Of course, that leaves out the possibility of a conspiracy that uses him as a figurehead, but really, I think America has too much stability/inertia for a coup.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-02 08:26 am (UTC)That is a reason why a coup attempt would not succeed, which isn't the same as a reason it won't be tried.
(No, I don't really think an attempt is likely.)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-02 11:12 am (UTC)That makes it sound like a pathological lack of initiative, but it's also what keeps you from biting off your neighbors' noses.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-02 03:49 pm (UTC)I'll acknowledge I could be wrong, here--the Bush administration has demonstrated to me several times now how flawed my model for non-crazy political decisionmaking is. But I don't buy it at all.
There are circumstances where I could imagine this having some possibility of working--say, a very popular and successful president at the end of his second term, having won a couple wars and rescued the economy from disaster, now about to be replaced by an extremely unpopular and apparently incompetent alternative, say after a really effective third-party candidate let the winner come out with, say, 36% of the popular vote or something. But not with this set of facts, IMO.
--albatross
no subject
Date: 2008-11-03 11:31 pm (UTC)I'm quite serious. The one thing that is clearest about Bush's White House is that it is designed never to tell him what he doesn't want to hear.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 10:32 am (UTC)