Geek Pride Day
May. 25th, 2010 08:58 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If there is a discussion about something geeky, you must give your opinion.
In celebration, post something geeky. If you're not posting it as a comment, please let me know where you're posting it.
1000 x 1000 x 1000 Rubik's cube
It's possible to compute the nth decimal digit of pi without computing the preceding digits.
It was very satisfying to read in a Robin Hobb novel that calligraphy can look dry without being really and truly dry. Getting the details right is very geeky.
Reminder thanks to
starcat_jewel.
In celebration, post something geeky. If you're not posting it as a comment, please let me know where you're posting it.
1000 x 1000 x 1000 Rubik's cube
It's possible to compute the nth decimal digit of pi without computing the preceding digits.
It was very satisfying to read in a Robin Hobb novel that calligraphy can look dry without being really and truly dry. Getting the details right is very geeky.
Reminder thanks to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 02:02 pm (UTC)My contribution for today (which is tjey).
no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 02:26 pm (UTC)3. If there is a discussion about something geeky, you must give your opinion.
6. Don't be a generalized geek. You must specialize in something.
Accordingly, I disclaim the whole list. The people who came up with it will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 04:42 pm (UTC)You might want to check my LJ for meta-geeking.
Geeking for Gardner
Date: 2010-05-26 02:53 pm (UTC)http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18950-magic-numbers-a-meeting-of-mathemagical-tricksters.html
origami fonts. Bizarre tilings of the plane. Strange probability.
almost completely OT
Date: 2010-06-16 04:36 pm (UTC)No doubt this has been written about at length, and no doubt there's a whole body of literature devoted to Gandalf (after all, he sets most things in motion in the books), but I'm intrigued by how LoTR illuminates current screenwriting conventions. If we accept, for a moment, that Gandalf is the protagonist and Frodo is his mule/safety device, then in a current TV screenplay there would be a denouement: to be satisfying the mule/gull would have to turn, outfox the fox, or understand the whole plot and decide it's for the best after all, which gives them the agency they've been lacking. IIRC we never get this from Frodo; he doesn't go through a crisis and realisation regarding Gandalf, only regarding the true cost of bearing and destroying the Ring.
Re: almost completely OT
From: