Can this work?
Oct. 2nd, 2011 09:18 amStatement from the demonstrators on Wall Street-- it's a list of the things they don't like.
My impression is that successful demonstrations (more likely, series of demonstrations) make specific demands for particular actions. End segregation, the head of state should resign, get out of Viet Nam, that sort of thing.
A list of the people and organizations in finance that should be up on charges would be nice.
Am I missing something?
My impression is that successful demonstrations (more likely, series of demonstrations) make specific demands for particular actions. End segregation, the head of state should resign, get out of Viet Nam, that sort of thing.
A list of the people and organizations in finance that should be up on charges would be nice.
Am I missing something?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-02 03:17 pm (UTC)I would like to see a lot of people and organizations in finance up on charges. I think I'll probably be in favor of the specific actions. I'm not getting up to do anything for a movement that merely opposes badness.
I think right now, the main reason this is turning into a mass movement is police repression. If the police had left these folks alone, they would have fizzled out.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-02 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-02 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-02 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-02 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-02 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 01:01 pm (UTC)I was trying to look at the protests that succeed.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-02 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 02:46 am (UTC)http://studentactivism.net/2011/10/02/ows-demands/
He's been at the scene and is writing some great blog posts.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 05:34 am (UTC)Sort of D'oh. They're NOT unrelated. It is corporate decisions that actually do all these things.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 05:44 am (UTC)We come to you at a time when corporations, which place profit over people, self-interest over justice, and oppression over equality, run our governments. [....]
They have taken our houses through an illegal foreclosure process, despite not having the original mortgage.
They have taken bailouts from taxpayers with impunity, and continue to give Executives exorbitant bonuses.
They have perpetuated inequality and discrimination in the workplace based on age, the color of one’s skin, sex, gender identity and sexual orientation.
It goes on, tying each item to the corporations by the repeated "They have".
no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 05:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 10:14 am (UTC)This not a criticism, but a necessary element. Building real solutions takes considerable time. But the first step is to force a recognition that the current status quo is not working and that the protesters need to be included in the process.
The WTO protests back in '99-00 worked this way. The protests forced World Bank, WTO, and other global organizations to admit "civil society" observers and to include civil society non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the discussions of trade policy at specific levels. While hardly a solution to all ills, it did significantly change the dynamic and the outcomes.
One may wonder, why isn't any of this in the news. To the mass consciousness, the "anti-globalization movement" protested and flamed out. Well, NGOs sitting in meetings, working with nation blocks, and using resolutions and process to counter corporate influence is boring. It doesn't make the news. So most folks think the anti-globalization movement was a bunch of professional protesters who eventually gave up, whereas the truth is actually far more complicated.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 01:06 pm (UTC)Reread Idris Shah (a popular writer about Sufism) is somewhere on my to-do list. He talks about the importance of being able to notice subtle inputs.