Little teeny license plates for bees
Oct. 31st, 2011 11:12 amWhat Should I Look For In a UI Typeface?-- a discussion of what makes fonts readable when they're very small and a little short on pixels.
This is interesting for calligraphy-- I hadn't realized that the double-story small a (with a hook on top) and the double-story g (loop on the bottom instead of a tail) contributed so much to legibility, though they'd become habits in most of my calligraphy for no obvious reason.
Chalk up additional reasons for considering the handwriting I was taught in school to be unsatisfactory-- the print a and g were single story.
From The Making of FF Tundra
This is something for me to mull, as is the rest of that article.
The next point in the piece about UI fonts is the x-height, but it doesn't discuss how tall ascenders need to be so that words have distinctive shapes.
Link thanks to Geek Press.
Context for the subject line here.
This is interesting for calligraphy-- I hadn't realized that the double-story small a (with a hook on top) and the double-story g (loop on the bottom instead of a tail) contributed so much to legibility, though they'd become habits in most of my calligraphy for no obvious reason.
Chalk up additional reasons for considering the handwriting I was taught in school to be unsatisfactory-- the print a and g were single story.
From The Making of FF Tundra
A typeface has two principle directions: The horizontal, the line, which the eye moves along; and the vertical of the individual characters, defined predominantly by the stems. The stems are responsible for the rhythm of a typeface, while the curves (bowls, instrokes, outstrokes, etc) determine its character.
This is something for me to mull, as is the rest of that article.
The next point in the piece about UI fonts is the x-height, but it doesn't discuss how tall ascenders need to be so that words have distinctive shapes.
Link thanks to Geek Press.
Context for the subject line here.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 04:59 pm (UTC)Thanks for the link about fonts for UIs! A lot of the article is also relevant to selecting fonts for making LJ icons. I was just look over free fonts available online and wondering whether the designers had even considered readability as a priority.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 11:48 pm (UTC)Understood. If I'm doing an icon with just a single word on it (Yuletide, for example), I can get away with many display fonts. But some were too unreadable even for that.
(I like your points about why it's easier to design a body text font. That's why I actually spent money on a set of Adobe "Web friendly" fonts at one point, so I'd have them if I wanted to use more than a couple of words in a tiny space.)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-01 05:57 am (UTC)Some places you can get free fonts, many of which looks pretty good: