Sep. 9th, 2004

nancylebov: blue moon (Default)
I don't have a dog and I don't expect to ever have one (though I recently met a remarkably charming Britanny spaniel--there may be more to life than feline reserve), but I've been wondering whether it's possible to train a leashed dog to unwind itself. Do some dogs figure it out on their own and/or refrain from getting wound around whatever?
nancylebov: blue moon (Default)
I don't have a dog and I don't expect to ever have one (though I recently met a remarkably charming Britanny spaniel--there may be more to life than feline reserve), but I've been wondering whether it's possible to train a leashed dog to unwind itself. Do some dogs figure it out on their own and/or refrain from getting wound around whatever?
nancylebov: blue moon (Default)
a rant about liberalism and despair.

While I don't agree that expecting the worst keeps the left from fighting back, I'd be curious about any answers to Wolcott's question of when the left started expecting the worst all the time, and any theories other than the loss of connection to the working class/unionism about what's going on.
nancylebov: blue moon (Default)
a rant about liberalism and despair.

While I don't agree that expecting the worst keeps the left from fighting back, I'd be curious about any answers to Wolcott's question of when the left started expecting the worst all the time, and any theories other than the loss of connection to the working class/unionism about what's going on.
nancylebov: blue moon (Default)
Unless there's a solid majority in the polls for one candidate that's reflected in the election results, half the country is going to think the election was stolen, except, perhaps, for a few mathematically inclined folks who think that really close elections are decided by noise.

There was a plausible argument in the Wall Street Journal back in 2000 about there being more and more close elections as both parties become equally good at running. Close elections are no more surprising than the way track and field times have been converging.

I wonder whether this is at all good for democracy--huge stakes are being decided by nothing much.
nancylebov: blue moon (Default)
Unless there's a solid majority in the polls for one candidate that's reflected in the election results, half the country is going to think the election was stolen, except, perhaps, for a few mathematically inclined folks who think that really close elections are decided by noise.

There was a plausible argument in the Wall Street Journal back in 2000 about there being more and more close elections as both parties become equally good at running. Close elections are no more surprising than the way track and field times have been converging.

I wonder whether this is at all good for democracy--huge stakes are being decided by nothing much.

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516 17181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2026 06:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios