nancylebov: blue moon (Default)
[personal profile] nancylebov
Long about Katrina's aftermath, I started taking a little time out from being angry at the current problems to worrying about the next Bush-related disaster that would be coming from some unexpected direction.

It looks as though it was the sub-prime crisis. After people did a whole lot of blaming home-owners (too stupid to read and/or think about their mortgages, or else they were speculators) or the financial industry (making bad loans, giving incentives to make bad loans, lying about how bad the loans were, re-packaging loans and re-selling them in ways that were hard to track, and just plain not thinking about whether what they were doing made sense), it turns out that HUD, headed by a Bush appointee, had the information needed to see things were going wrong, brushed it off, and changed the rules to make the situation worse.

I admit this is a do-my-homework-for-me sort of thing, but is anyone tracking Bush appointees and what they're doing?

The only mercy in this situation is that it seems to be a from the top mess, and I'm hoping a lot of the appointees were too lazy to put in too many of their friends. At least it isn't a full-fledged patronage system. The other mercy is (imho) a pretty good chance that the Republicans will be out-- but even if so, that's most of a year from now.

Date: 2008-04-19 01:24 pm (UTC)
madfilkentist: My cat Florestan (gray shorthair) (vote)
From: [personal profile] madfilkentist
If both candidates are equally bad, it would be better to vote out the current party just to flush out the worst effects of the current administration; a Democratic president would have less of a head start in doing damage.

I'm thinking of the possibility of Clinton vs. McCain.

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516 17181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 17th, 2026 07:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios