"That's crap!"
Sep. 17th, 2008 08:12 amI've been thinking about how civilized discourse isn't really an adequate translation of visceral response. Something like "I really hate that!" does not mean the same thing as "That's crap!". Really hating something carries with it a belief that it's so obviously hateful that anyone else in the vicinity should be recognizing the objective truth and hate it too.
On the other hand, a little civilized recognition that not everyone sees things the same way is both objectively true and avoids pointless quarrels.
I don't see any way to do justice to the way things feel and the way things are at the same time.
Addendum: I see that I didn't quite say what I meant. What I had in mind is that I might have the strong "That's crap!" reaction first, and then I tone it down to the civilized but emotionally inaccurate "I really hate that!".
On the other hand, a little civilized recognition that not everyone sees things the same way is both objectively true and avoids pointless quarrels.
I don't see any way to do justice to the way things feel and the way things are at the same time.
Addendum: I see that I didn't quite say what I meant. What I had in mind is that I might have the strong "That's crap!" reaction first, and then I tone it down to the civilized but emotionally inaccurate "I really hate that!".
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 01:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:07 pm (UTC)You're probably right about the source of the unclarity. I'm not sure how to sort it out. Maybe rewriting the whole thing to make the sequence of reactions and what happens cognitively and emotionally would help.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:10 pm (UTC)Mind projection fallacy?
Date: 2008-10-19 01:06 pm (UTC)"That's crap" = the crappiness is a property of the thing so described
"I really hate that!" = the hate is a property of me
-- ESY