Date: 2010-08-30 02:09 pm (UTC)
madfilkentist: My cat Florestan (gray shorthair) (Default)
From: [personal profile] madfilkentist
Unless something has a much more significant effect than what's being seen here, the changes in decay rate would be overshadowed by the inherent uncertainties in radiocarbon dating.

Date: 2010-08-30 05:15 pm (UTC)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
From: [personal profile] redbird
The article I read on this said that one thing they want to do next is look for some Southern Hemisphere data (or run some tests in the south if need be), in case the amount of radiation reaching the surface is a factor.

As I understand it, radioactive dating should be okay: a variation on that time scale will balance out over any time period that we're interested in here.

Date: 2010-08-30 06:26 pm (UTC)
ext_12246: (Default)
From: [identity profile] thnidu.livejournal.com
But what if there are longer-term variations? Or a gradual monotonic change?

Curiouser & curiouser.

Date: 2010-08-30 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metahacker.livejournal.com
Changes in neutrino flux?

Maybe there's a stimulated emission effect similar to lasers?

Interesting area to explore, that's for sure.

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516 17181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 16th, 2026 12:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios