What would you like to know how to do?
Feb. 8th, 2011 11:19 amProcedural Knowledge Gaps
Topics include cooking, flirting, orientation, exercise, buying stocks, making a will, remembering alphabetical order, jump-starting stalled cars....
It seems like it would make more sense to comment at Less Wrong rather than here (keep the conversation in one place), but I'm not going to insist. Setting up an account there might seem like more trouble than it's worth (and formatting for comments is in Markdown (see help button at lower right of comment box) not html, you might prefer familiar company, or there might be a reason I'm not thinking of.
I am beginning to suspect that it is surprisingly common for intelligent, competent adults to somehow make it through the world for a few decades while missing some ordinary skill, like mailing a physical letter, folding a fitted sheet, depositing a check, or reading a bus schedule. Since these tasks are often presented atomically - or, worse, embedded implicitly into other instructions - and it is often possible to get around the need for them, this ignorance is not self-correcting. One can Google "how to deposit a check" and similar phrases, but the sorts of instructions that crop up are often misleading, rely on entangled and potentially similarly-deficient knowledge to be understandable, or are not so much instructions as they are tips and tricks and warnings for people who already know the basic procedure. Asking other people is more effective because they can respond to requests for clarification (and physically pointing at stuff is useful too), but embarrassing, since lacking these skills as an adult is stigmatized. (They are rarely even considered skills by people who have had them for a while.)
This seems like a bad situation. And - if I am correct and gaps like these are common - then it is something of a collective action problem to handle gap-filling without undue social drama. Supposedly, we're good at collective action problems, us rationalists, right? So I propose a thread for the purpose here, with the stipulation that all replies to gap announcements are to be constructive attempts at conveying the relevant procedural knowledge. No asking "how did you manage to be X years old without knowing that?" - if the gap-haver wishes to volunteer the information, that is fine, but asking is to be considered poor form.
Topics include cooking, flirting, orientation, exercise, buying stocks, making a will, remembering alphabetical order, jump-starting stalled cars....
It seems like it would make more sense to comment at Less Wrong rather than here (keep the conversation in one place), but I'm not going to insist. Setting up an account there might seem like more trouble than it's worth (and formatting for comments is in Markdown (see help button at lower right of comment box) not html, you might prefer familiar company, or there might be a reason I'm not thinking of.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 06:43 pm (UTC)As a parent, I'm essentially responsible for making sure that my child gets to adulthood knowing how to wash himself and figure a tip, shave without getting razor burn (though I'm going to leave that to his dad, probably, when the time comes!) deposit a check, and so on. It's also up to me to notice if he doesn't seem able to tell when people want to be touched and to take some action before he's an adult. I feel equal to all of that...I just don't feel like I can tell other adults with whom I don't have a relationship of some kind, those things.
Is that weird of me? Should I comment anyway?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 06:48 pm (UTC)They're trying to get away from the idea that adults should already know all those things.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 08:10 pm (UTC)See, I have enough procedural knowledge to know that was a faux pas, or at least that it would be on some websites, but I also think I probably should just leave it there.
I couldn't respond to the person saying that she "sounded retarded" because what was I going to say? "Is ableism part of your rationalist ethos?" Or, "here's one way you can sound better when you speak--don't say things like that?"
I don't know-- that was a fascinating topic and a total time suck, and maybe next time I'll just go with not commenting.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 08:47 pm (UTC)I think I went a lot farther in pushing boundaries by suggesting that he might have an undiagnosed medical problem.
As for "sounds retarded" issue, I agree that you did well to not comment when you're that angry. The tone rules are rather different at LW than on LJ. Such topics can be brought up successfully, but swatting people generally isn't welcome.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 09:17 pm (UTC)I realized that Eliezer Yudowsky is the guy publishing one of the funniest Harry Potter fan fics of all time under the pen name Less Wrong. When my physicist buddy told me who he was, I went to his website and read a lot. If I had my way, his friends would all buy him a Wii and Dance Dance Revolution. (Hey, different strokes for different folks!) Because I'm not rational--I decided based on very little evidence that I like him and I want him to have fun.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 07:27 pm (UTC)He is still refusing to learn how to balance a check book too.
I know he doesn't want to grow up, but he can be annoying about it. Geeks in College. Some times I really wonder about them.
I know he will be quite happy in his old bedroom for a Long Time. I hope if there is a future wife, that she is real patient.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 02:55 am (UTC)I've not balanced a chequebook in... a decade or so i think. With online banking, online payment, computer-based accounting, and ATMs, who needs to balance it? I write at most 3 cheques a year, anyway. The rest of my spending comes out via debit card or ACH.
So, in short, though the basics of the accounting principals are good, i don't really see it as as necessary a skill as it was when i was younger, so long as the individual in the concepts of the evils of deficit spending.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 08:57 pm (UTC)Folding fitted sheets: who has the energy? roll 'em up, stop worrying, live longer. They weren't designed to be folded.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 10:26 pm (UTC)There are so many things you're supposed to know just for basic navigation. I'm in favour of something like an "instructables" site, all text or text + simple gfx, so you can get it on your cellphone. That would definitely help with fitting a spare tyre or recogmizing diabetes.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 07:20 am (UTC)