Objects of desire
Apr. 8th, 2011 10:17 amIn general, I'm not interested in media tsotskes [1], but when I saw these hello watchmen dolls, my first reaction was, "Are these really for sale? Want!".
Tragically, they are not, but there will eventually be a coffee table book of 101 hello kitties by a photographer-- a photographer who I suspect is unusually good at subliminal basilisks.
[1] That's a guesswork spelling of a yiddish word from my childhood. Chotchkies? To my mind, some of those words don't really have English spellings. They exist in a different range [2] Anyway, it means knickknacks.
[2] See also koppinchinik, which is a word meaning a child making a loud noise. I believe the derivation has to do with hitting a china teapot.
ETA:
chomiji said A metal teakettle or pot, actually, which would make a sound rather like an old-style fire bell when struck with a metal spoon.
A "chainik," diminutive of "chai" (tea), was an essential accessory for all households, including those unlikely to have a fancy, breakable china one.
This makes a lot more sense.
Link thanks to
rysmiel.
Tragically, they are not, but there will eventually be a coffee table book of 101 hello kitties by a photographer-- a photographer who I suspect is unusually good at subliminal basilisks.
[1] That's a guesswork spelling of a yiddish word from my childhood. Chotchkies? To my mind, some of those words don't really have English spellings. They exist in a different range [2] Anyway, it means knickknacks.
[2] See also koppinchinik, which is a word meaning a child making a loud noise. I believe the derivation has to do with hitting a china teapot.
ETA:
A "chainik," diminutive of "chai" (tea), was an essential accessory for all households, including those unlikely to have a fancy, breakable china one.
This makes a lot more sense.
Link thanks to
no subject
Date: 2011-04-09 01:48 am (UTC)In UK English: It took me a while to figure out why Arthur C. Clarke in one story referred to a dress store (factory?) as a "smutter shop."
no subject
Date: 2011-04-09 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:37 pm (UTC)OBJECTS OF DESIRE ARE FURTHER THAN THEY APPEAR.
Use it as you will.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 03:11 pm (UTC)#2 is ~~ "hockin (a) chainik" ([ˈhɑkɪn(ə)ˈt͜ʃaɪnɪk]). It means 'banging a teapot', and is an idiom: "Hock mir nit a tshainik!" = "Stop bugging me!", lit. "Don't bang a teapot at me!"
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 03:23 pm (UTC)A metal teakettle or pot, actually, which would make a sound rather like an old-style fire bell when struck with a metal spoon.
A "chainik," diminutive of "chai" (tea), was an essential accessory for all households, including those unlikely to have a fancy, breakable china one.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-09 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-09 05:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-09 06:56 pm (UTC)Do I have to explain EVERYTHING around here?
no subject
Date: 2011-04-09 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-09 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 05:15 pm (UTC)I didn't realize how bad-tempered this was getting because I was being optimistic about the tone being attitude for the fun of it. It's now clear to me that's not the direction it's going.
I'm not used to being a moderator, so please be patient with me if possible.
What I'm seeing now is that soderya posted a slogan-- it's usual though not obligatory for people to bounce variations off each other, but thespian phrased it as though it would be better if soderya changed the slogan.... (rather than, say, suggesting the change to me) .... and at that point sodyera started defending territory. And thespian swatted at the slogan as a way of getting at sodyera a little.
I'd say that thespian has been less careful about boundaries, but both of you have been escalating. I'm fairly conflict averse, and I prefer using this lj for a mixture of cool ideas, wonderful stuff, and occasional political outrage.
Can you both tone it down?
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:14 pm (UTC)What part of all this was "uncalled for?" No such thing was ever intended. I'm sorry if it was, but I think we're experiencing the side-effects of a Mercury Retrogade. In astrology, the planet Mercury is said to affect communications, and this is just the sort of miscue that happens at this time. Please explain what you objected to.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:36 pm (UTC)Since I don't know you, there's no smile there, there's no joke. It's a pretty clearly insulting phrase. Keep that sort of thing to your friends, not to people online.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 11:13 pm (UTC)A failure to communicate
Date: 2011-04-11 11:58 am (UTC)Being slightly dyslexic I'd stopped using emoticons some time ago becuase they were often opaque to me when reading text.
(e.g., "Huh? Qu'est ce que c'est? Oh.")
Some time ago I'd decided to just let my wording and context carry the intent of my statements and/or comments; whenever I thought something was ambiguous I would label the statement with the following: "(joke)".
I'm Sorry that I assumed you were a friend. Before you overreact to that, I'm bad at names to begin with and I have lots of friends (online and elsewhere) whose names I don't remember. And I was serious about the Mercury Retrograde, which ends @ 6:15 pm on April 23.
There, that's what I get for trying to cultivate a light and airy editorial style. (joke)