If the BBC can be believed, the Chinese generally think they ought to have Tibet because it's really theirs, but how much good (financially or in resources or in any other way) does it do them?
This isn't an answer to your question, but it's related to motives:
One of my roommates was the daughter of a Chinese government official (her father). She was completely unsympathetic to the idea of Tibetan independence. She talked about how the Chinese government provides economic aid to the area, and how her mother was heavily involved in getting private donors to help out, too. The picture she seemed to have was that the Tibetans are this poor minority who really need help, but are being derailed by separatists who are not representative of the larger population, and don't have the best interests of the region in mind.
It struck me as somewhat close of a Chinese version of "White Man's Burden" argument, but she wasn't budging I decided not to debate it further.
Even though she's a daughter of a government official, she said this as if it were some kind of common misconception among Westerners and outsiders in general. This makes me think that others in China have similar perspectives on the issue.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-01 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-01 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-01 05:21 pm (UTC)The other one that occurs to me is maybe control of the water from the rivers starting there, but I don't know how significant that would be.
But mostly I suspect it is just because they can, which is how most countries seem to operate.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-01 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-01 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-01 06:55 pm (UTC)For a start.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-01 11:46 pm (UTC)One of my roommates was the daughter of a Chinese government official (her father). She was completely unsympathetic to the idea of Tibetan independence. She talked about how the Chinese government provides economic aid to the area, and how her mother was heavily involved in getting private donors to help out, too. The picture she seemed to have was that the Tibetans are this poor minority who really need help, but are being derailed by separatists who are not representative of the larger population, and don't have the best interests of the region in mind.
It struck me as somewhat close of a Chinese version of "White Man's Burden" argument, but she wasn't budging I decided not to debate it further.
Even though she's a daughter of a government official, she said this as if it were some kind of common misconception among Westerners and outsiders in general. This makes me think that others in China have similar perspectives on the issue.