It's not that we should be better than demonizing the other side, it's that we should have more sense--after all, they're a lot of the people we need to recruit.
I'm assuming that it's no harder to get people to change their point of view than to get someone interested who's been ignoring politics. If anyone here has evidence one way or the other on this, I'm quite interested.
Bush does a pretty good job of alienating people, but let's not make it harder for him by pretending that anyone who supports him doesn't have a heart and a mind.
They aren't aliens, they aren't things, and both "Republican" and "Bush supporter" are choices (in the case of party affiliation, possibly a habit), not unchangable identities.
The problem is that bigotry is *fun*. It makes you feel superior, it lets you hope that you're keeping the people on your side in place, and it's easy to get a laugh by making yet another joke about not letting your kid marry a Republican.
The other problem may be that bigotry works, but I'm hoping there are better strategies.
I'm assuming that it's no harder to get people to change their point of view than to get someone interested who's been ignoring politics. If anyone here has evidence one way or the other on this, I'm quite interested.
Bush does a pretty good job of alienating people, but let's not make it harder for him by pretending that anyone who supports him doesn't have a heart and a mind.
They aren't aliens, they aren't things, and both "Republican" and "Bush supporter" are choices (in the case of party affiliation, possibly a habit), not unchangable identities.
The problem is that bigotry is *fun*. It makes you feel superior, it lets you hope that you're keeping the people on your side in place, and it's easy to get a laugh by making yet another joke about not letting your kid marry a Republican.
The other problem may be that bigotry works, but I'm hoping there are better strategies.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 11:45 am (UTC)I try not to tell them they're sheep who have surrendered the right to free will because they let their patriotic reluctance to question a president take precendence over their patriotic duty to question a president. I have a little crease in my tongue from where I've bitten it in the process of resistng this urge. While I believe that many members of the Bush administration are evil, and many, many more are grossly mistaken, however good their intentions are, I don't try and imply that the people who voted for them are evil--just that they've been sold a bill of goods by people who lie so they can make money--Cheney and Halliburton make a great selling point.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 02:48 pm (UTC)Speaking as someone who was at one point married to a surface-warfare type Naval officer (he's still my husband, he's just not in the Navy any more), Navy pilots don't have a clue, period. "Their brains don't function below 3000 feet," as the saying went.
There was an interesting op-ed in the NY Times the other day, pointing out that the Army isn't just failing to make its recruiting goals these days, it's losing junior officers to resignation at a rate not seen since the Viet Nam era.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 06:06 pm (UTC)2. On the NYT piece:
People who can see the handwriting on the wall often feel compelled to read it. Once that happens, they often start thinking about it.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 01:07 pm (UTC)I regard the Democrats and Republicans who hold high office, with a handful of exceptions, as equally contemptible. Voters are a different matter; I recognize that they have to choose from available alternatives. If the Democrats have relatively little power right now, their ideas are still influential. The idea that the commerce clause extends into every cranny of private life was invented to uphold Roosevelt's New Deal legislation, and it was the driving principle behind the medical marijuana decision. The idea that property isn't yours by right, but is only held in trust for society, was the driving principle behind the eminent domain decision.
Mutatis mutandis, though, your advice does apply to me. The object of my argumentation should be to persuade people, not to let them know how idiotic I think they are. Remembering this, and figuring out ways to reach people through commonalities, can be a difficult job, particularly when talking with people of left-wing persuasions (who are the ones I encounter more often) who consider name-calling a sufficient argument and thus are practically begging to be answered in kind.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 04:40 pm (UTC)The specific recent trigger was a random conversation at Whole Foods. A woman in the checkout line picked up a copy of Architectural Digest and asked how much plastic surgery the woman on the cover had. I said it looked like a fair amount, and that the woman on the cover looked unhappy. The woman I'm talking to says that of course she's unhappy, she's married to a Republican. (I don't know whether she knew who the guy on the cover was or if it was just that they looked rich.)
I suggested that sometimes mixed marriages do work out, and that the woman on the cover might be a Republican. Neither suggestion seemed to register.
I'm sorry that I don't have more examples handy, but I'll try to keep track of more conversations.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 05:51 pm (UTC)