nancylebov: blue moon (Default)
[personal profile] nancylebov
I recently heard some talk based on the idea that the reaction to the Bush administration most worth encouraging is fear.

I have two problems with this. One is merely factual--the administration is much weaker than it was. It's made disasterous mistakes, and the natural incompatities among its supporters are getting interesting. This doesn't mean it's become harmless and there are certainly still excellent reasons to oppose it, but imho, it's not nearly as scary as it was a year or two ago.

The other is psychological. Amp up the fear too high, and some people get paralyzed.

I'm asking those of you who've been following politics more carefully than I have: what mix of emotional appeals have contributed to changes you've wanted?

Date: 2005-10-19 05:16 pm (UTC)
zenlizard: Because the current occupation is fascist. (Default)
From: [personal profile] zenlizard
This is really a question of tactics: It's not so much as "what mix", as "what mix is/would be most effective *at this time*?"

Date: 2005-10-19 07:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
Fair enough. Do you have any opinions about the best current mix?

Date: 2005-10-19 10:58 pm (UTC)
zenlizard: Because the current occupation is fascist. (Default)
From: [personal profile] zenlizard
Thinking about it, even my re-phrasing isn't good enough. An even better question would be "What is the best mix for *these* particular people* at *this particular time*?"

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 02:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios