![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
nancylebovAll I'm hoping for is a president who isn't absolutely awful. You have no idea how much I want to get back to ordinary levels of stupidity, viciousness, and incompetence.
In that spirit, I'm considerably relieved by the results in Iowa. Obama seems to be the most innocuous candidate[1], and while unless I've missed something I disagree with everything in Huckabee's platform, at least he isn't running on a "I'm cool because I'm mean" theme.
On the other hand, and not to indulge in conspiratorial libel, there are quite a few candidates who have a lot to gain from a terrorist attack on the US before the election.
[1] I strongly agree with Paul's stand on the war on drugs, and he's the only pre-candidate that stand, but he's too flakey otherwise for my taste. The Democratic candidate is going to have to be utterly superb pie crust to get me to vote for Paul.
In that spirit, I'm considerably relieved by the results in Iowa. Obama seems to be the most innocuous candidate[1], and while unless I've missed something I disagree with everything in Huckabee's platform, at least he isn't running on a "I'm cool because I'm mean" theme.
On the other hand, and not to indulge in conspiratorial libel, there are quite a few candidates who have a lot to gain from a terrorist attack on the US before the election.
[1] I strongly agree with Paul's stand on the war on drugs, and he's the only pre-candidate that stand, but he's too flakey otherwise for my taste. The Democratic candidate is going to have to be utterly superb pie crust to get me to vote for Paul.
