Random Question
May. 4th, 2006 05:02 pmIf you could have an ounce of gold in any form you wanted, what would you choose and why?
I raised this question in one of the rasf* groups a while ago, and got an interesting variety of answers.
I'd like a nugget because it'll have more geological information to it than gold which has been melted and molded and it'll have an interesting surface.
I raised this question in one of the rasf* groups a while ago, and got an interesting variety of answers.
I'd like a nugget because it'll have more geological information to it than gold which has been melted and molded and it'll have an interesting surface.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 09:22 pm (UTC)And I'm asking for it in specifically that phrasing, because what turns up in reply will be informative.
If that's cheating, I'd like jewelry from either Stone Age Varna or Minoan Crete.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 10:40 pm (UTC)Since I'm running this thing, I'd allow it, especially since I'd be interested in the results myself.
Thanks for the heads-up about the Varna gold--I'd never heard of it.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 10:55 pm (UTC)At least we can be sure that my friend's spec of all information ever known by the human race is a specification of something real, but there's no reason to think it will all be known at one time in a way which can be imprinted on an ounce of gold.
My merely-not-owned-by-me nugget seems very solid by comparison.
This is reminding me of Hofstadter's layers of Tumbolia. Tumbolia is where software goes when the hardware is no longer supporting it. He suggests that a knot which is merely untied is in a shallower layer of Tumbolia than a knot whose rope is burned. Presumably, if the human race is gone with no successors, then that knot and much else would be much deeper in Tumbolia.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 11:09 pm (UTC)Failing that, if the provenance is cheating, then superfine gold wire, just because I think it's cool.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 12:28 am (UTC)I've heard that nuggets are valuable, but probably not as valuable as a very rare coin.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 12:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 08:34 am (UTC)YIS,
WRI
no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 01:16 pm (UTC)Otherwise I'll take it as mined asteroidal gold.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 01:35 pm (UTC)So how about an ounce of pure gold distilled from the Sun? Gold is about 5.0e-10 percent (cite (http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=224308)) of the mass of the sun, which still leaves about 10 zettagrams of the stuff (cite (http://www.google.com/search?q=mass+of+the+sun+*+5e-12)). I don't think anyone would miss it. Au-197 only, please, I don't need radioactive stuff.
Granted, ultimately it's all star-stuff, but I think it'd be a neat souvenir of this backwater, if I ever get out of here.
Once of gold
Date: 2006-05-05 08:53 pm (UTC)KG
no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 06:42 pm (UTC)