![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
From the NYTimes:
*****
The Times article also has somewhat about the economic effects of beauty and height.
Link thanks to Mind Hacks.
That is what both Howard Bodenhorn, an economist at Clemson University, and Mr. Price concluded from 19th-century prison records. In that era increased body weight was associated with a lower risk of [committing] crime. In the 21st century, though, in which service jobs are much more common, Mr. Price found that being overweight was linked to a higher risk of [committing] crime.
*****
Mr. Price has suggested that there may be policy implications in his work, saying, “Public health policies successful at reducing obesity among individuals in the population will not only make society healthier, but also safer.”
The Times article also has somewhat about the economic effects of beauty and height.
Link thanks to Mind Hacks.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 01:55 pm (UTC)* People who have been convicted of a crime have a record that makes it much more difficult for them to get decent jobs, and therefore are more likely to be poor.
* People who have high time preference (that is, are motivated by immediate rewards much more strongly than by long-term rewards) are both more likely to be poor and more likely to commit crimes.
* People who commit crimes, but are rich, can afford high-priced lawyers; poor criminals get public defenders working in a system that rewards plea bargains. Poor people are therefore more likely to be counted as criminals in proportion to the rate at which they commit crimes.
Each of these supports a different social and political narrative. Do you have independent evidence that your interpretation and your narrative identify the causal paths correctly?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-15 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 11:07 am (UTC)Correlation is not causality. Eliminating some or all of the many factors that lead to obesity may have a positive effect on the crime rate, but I seriously doubt that efforts aimed simply at the weight issue will have much of an effect.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 12:04 pm (UTC)I wish I could stop being surprised and dismayed by this kind of thing.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 01:53 pm (UTC)And I thought "Harrison Bergeron" was fiction. Are they sure he was being facetious?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 02:31 pm (UTC)I've wondered if you could come out ahead by deliberately hiring people who are likely to be discriminated against to get access to a lot of otherwise wasted competence.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 05:06 pm (UTC)Market forces tend to erode discrimination over time; but ironically, if you command market actors to behave as if that erosion had already gone to completion, the outcome is often that discrimination gets worse, because there's no payoff for undermining it.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-15 12:56 am (UTC)